Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/2553
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorHaywood, D.en_US
dc.contributorCrocker, K.en_US
dc.contributorGnatt, I.en_US
dc.contributorJenkins, Z.en_US
dc.contributorBhat, R.en_US
dc.contributorLalitha, Anoop Raveendran Nairen_US
dc.contributorButterfield, I.en_US
dc.contributorCastle, D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-14T11:18:12Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-14T11:18:12Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.govdoc02546en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/2553-
dc.description.abstractHigh staff turnover is common within the Australian public mental health workforce, contributing to workforce shortages and ultimately impacting the ability to provide stable efficient, effective, and ongoing optimal care to the community. In this study, we aimed to (a) establish the most pertinent factors associated with increased turnover intention in the public mental health workforce in Australia, and (b) establish whether such factors differ between metropolitan and rural services. We used a cross-sectional, correlational design using an online survey method. In total, 235 mental health service staff of various disciplines and levels, from four public hospitals in Victoria, Australia participated in the study. We used three feed-forward multiple regression analyses to assess the study aims. We found that job satisfaction, occupational burnout, and understaffing may be the most pertinent factors to consider regarding turnover intention. Job satisfaction and occupational burnout were factors endorsed across the entire sample, as well as specifically within both the metropolitan and rural services, while understaffing was a pertinent factor regarding turnover intention across the entire sample and for rural services, but not metropolitan services. Our findings regarding the pertinence of job satisfaction, occupational burnout, and understaffing in turnover intention provide key information that may be used to inform interventional targets aimed at reducing attrition from the public mental health workforce in Australia.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2024-04-26T03:51:25Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2024-06-14T11:18:12Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-06-14T11:18:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2024en
dc.titleWhat accounts for turnover intention in the Australian public mental health workforce?.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursingen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume33en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue2en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage359en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage368en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusBURNOUTen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusJOB SATISFACTIONen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusMENTAL HEALTH WORKFORCEen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusRETENTIONen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusTURNOVER INTENTIONen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusUNDERSTAFFINGen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/inm.13233en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.