Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11054/2822
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Stretton, B. | en_US |
dc.contributor | Montagu, A. | en_US |
dc.contributor | Kunnel, A. | en_US |
dc.contributor | Louise, J. | en_US |
dc.contributor | Behrendt, N. | en_US |
dc.contributor | Kovoor, Joshua | en_US |
dc.contributor | Bacchi, S. | en_US |
dc.contributor | Thomas, J. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-29T03:33:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-11-29T03:33:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.govdoc | 02793 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11054/2822 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Student-led Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) provide formative learning opportunities prior to Faculty-led OSCEs. It is important to undertake quality assurance measurements of peer-led assessments because, if they are found to be unreliable and invalid, they may have detrimental impacts. The objectives of this study were to explore and evaluate Student-led OSCEs hosted by fifth-year medical students. Methods: Student-led OSCE results were analysed to examine reliability (Cronbach's alpha). The relationship between Student-led and Faculty-led OSCEs was evaluated using linear regression. Qualitative data were acquired by survey and semi-structured interviews and were analysed using an inductive content analysis approach. Results: In total, 85 (94%) of 91 eligible students consented to study participation. Student-led OSCEs had a low-moderate reliability [Cronbach alpha = 0.47 (primary care) and 0.61 (human reproduction/paediatrics) (HRH)]. A statistically significant, positive relationship between Student-led and Faculty-led OSCE results was observed. Faculty-led OSCE grades increased by 0.49 (95% CI: 0.18, 0.80) to 1.09 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.52), for each percentage increase in Student-led OSCE result. Student-led OSCE participants highly valued the authentic peer-assessed experience. Reported benefits included a reduction of perceived stress and anxiety prior to Faculty-led OSCEs, recognition of learning gaps, contribution to overall clinical competency and facilitation of collaboration between peers. Discussion: Student-led OSCEs are moderately reliable and can predict Faculty-led OSCE performance. This form of near-peer assessment encourages the metacognitive process of reflective practice and can be effectively implemented to direct further study. Faculties should collaborate with their student bodies to facilitate Student-led OSCEs and offer assistance to improve the quality, and benefits, of these endeavours. | en_US |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2024-10-31T00:43:52Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Approved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2024-11-29T03:33:34Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-11-29T03:33:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2024 | en |
dc.title | Perceived and actual value of student-led objective structured clinical examinations. | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.type.specified | Article | en_US |
dc.bibliographicCitation.title | The Clinical Teacher | en_US |
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume | 21 | en_US |
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage | e13754 | en_US |
dc.subject.healththesaurus | EDUCATION | en_US |
dc.subject.healththesaurus | OSCE | en_US |
dc.subject.healththesaurus | MEDICAL STUDENTS | en_US |
dc.subject.healththesaurus | EXAMINATION | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13754 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Research Output |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.