Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/2822
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorStretton, B.en_US
dc.contributorMontagu, A.en_US
dc.contributorKunnel, A.en_US
dc.contributorLouise, J.en_US
dc.contributorBehrendt, N.en_US
dc.contributorKovoor, Joshuaen_US
dc.contributorBacchi, S.en_US
dc.contributorThomas, J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-29T03:33:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-29T03:33:34Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.govdoc02793en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/2822-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Student-led Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) provide formative learning opportunities prior to Faculty-led OSCEs. It is important to undertake quality assurance measurements of peer-led assessments because, if they are found to be unreliable and invalid, they may have detrimental impacts. The objectives of this study were to explore and evaluate Student-led OSCEs hosted by fifth-year medical students. Methods: Student-led OSCE results were analysed to examine reliability (Cronbach's alpha). The relationship between Student-led and Faculty-led OSCEs was evaluated using linear regression. Qualitative data were acquired by survey and semi-structured interviews and were analysed using an inductive content analysis approach. Results: In total, 85 (94%) of 91 eligible students consented to study participation. Student-led OSCEs had a low-moderate reliability [Cronbach alpha = 0.47 (primary care) and 0.61 (human reproduction/paediatrics) (HRH)]. A statistically significant, positive relationship between Student-led and Faculty-led OSCE results was observed. Faculty-led OSCE grades increased by 0.49 (95% CI: 0.18, 0.80) to 1.09 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.52), for each percentage increase in Student-led OSCE result. Student-led OSCE participants highly valued the authentic peer-assessed experience. Reported benefits included a reduction of perceived stress and anxiety prior to Faculty-led OSCEs, recognition of learning gaps, contribution to overall clinical competency and facilitation of collaboration between peers. Discussion: Student-led OSCEs are moderately reliable and can predict Faculty-led OSCE performance. This form of near-peer assessment encourages the metacognitive process of reflective practice and can be effectively implemented to direct further study. Faculties should collaborate with their student bodies to facilitate Student-led OSCEs and offer assistance to improve the quality, and benefits, of these endeavours.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2024-10-31T00:43:52Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2024-11-29T03:33:34Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-11-29T03:33:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2024en
dc.titlePerceived and actual value of student-led objective structured clinical examinations.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleThe Clinical Teacheren_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume21en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue4en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpagee13754en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusEDUCATIONen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusOSCEen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusMEDICAL STUDENTSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusEXAMINATIONen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13754en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.