Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/2826
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorOng, W.en_US
dc.contributorEvans, S.en_US
dc.contributorEvans, M.en_US
dc.contributorTacey, M.en_US
dc.contributorDodds, Lachlanen_US
dc.contributorKearns, P.en_US
dc.contributorMilne, R.en_US
dc.contributorForoudi, F.en_US
dc.contributorMillar, J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-29T03:44:44Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-29T03:44:44Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.govdoc02789en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/2826-
dc.description.abstractConservative management, specifically with active surveillance (AS), has emerged as the preferred approach for low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC). We evaluated the trend for conservative management (ie, no active treatment within 12 mo of diagnosis) for LRPC in an Australian population-based cohort of men captured in the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry Victoria (PCOR-Vic). Of the 3201 men diagnosed with LRPC between January 2009 and December 2016, 60% (1928/3201) had conservative management, and 52% (1664/3201) were documented to be on AS. There was an increase in conservative management from 52% in 2009 to 73% in 2016 (p < 0.001), largely attributable to an increase in AS from 33% in 2009 to 67% in 2016 (p < 0.001). When stratified by age group, the increase in conservative management was more pronounced among younger patients: from 37% to 66% for men aged <60 yr versus from 72% to 86% for men aged ≥70 yr. In multivariable analyses, increasing age, lower prostate-specific antigen and clinical category, lower socioeconomic status, and being diagnosed in public metropolitan institutions were all independently associated with a greater likelihood of conservative management. Identification of sociodemographic and institutional variations in practice allows for targeted strategies to improve management for men with LRPC. Patient summary We looked at the uptake of conservative management (no active treatment within 12 mo of diagnosis) over time in an Australian population-based cohort of men with low-risk prostate cancer. The proportion of men with low-risk prostate cancer managed conservatively increased from 52% in 2009 to 73% in 2016. The increase in the uptake of conservative management for low-risk prostate cancer in Australia is concordant with international guidelines and other international population-based studies.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2024-10-30T05:15:13Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2024-11-29T03:44:44Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-11-29T03:44:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2024en
dc.titleTrends in conservative management for low-risk prostate cancer in a population-based cohort of Australian men diagnosed between 2009 and 2016.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleEuropean Urology Oncologyen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume4en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue2en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage319en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage322en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusPROSTATE CANCERen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusACTIVE SURVEILLANCEen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusPATTERNS OF CAREen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2019.04.006en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.